Nesna University: Online Chat with Andrew Vachss

Nesna University in Norway hosted a conference titled “The Internet – a hiding ground for pedophiles?” At the invitation of Professor Per Arne Godejord, Andrew Vachss participated in an online discussion with the students, meant to be an experimental example of how to interweave ethical considerations with technological expertise.

October 1st and 2nd, 2003, the Department of Computer and Information Science,
Nesna University College, Campus I Rana, hosted an online discussion between our
3rd-year bachelor students and Andrew Vachss. The topic was child abuse and the internet as a tool for abusers. The questions from the students to Andrew Vachss ranged from how they could use their education to battle child abuse, differences between pedophiles and predatory pedophiles, society’s reactions to predatory pedophiles, and rules of engagement in the war against child abuse. The conclusion reached at the end of the 2nd session is best summarized by Andrew Vachss himself: “We are all punching a wall. Whose fist finally breaks through does not matter. What matters is that our collective pounding finally weaken it to that point.”

View the PDF that documents the 2 sessions as it appeared on the computer screens of the participants. The sessions were a part of a new angle on how to organize the course Social Informatics as an experimental example on how to teach ethical topics to computer
students.

My name is Per Arne Godejord, and I am Assistant Professor in Social Informatics here at Nesna University College, Norway. All of us at the Department of Computer and Information Science believe that we should not send computer professionals out on the streets without a proper understanding of the human side of computers.

Most computer students dread the course in Social Informatics, and in the words of one of them: “This is just Marx. No practical computer stuff.” So what to do?

If the students felt the course unimportant and uninspiring — would they learn anything? My answer was to rebuild the course and make it more practical, and with one topic as the main ethical theme. The topic I chose was child porn on the Internet, and in March 2003 Nesna University College, as the only educational institution in Norway, signed an agreement with the Norwegian Save the Children to work closely with them on this issue.

At the 24th of September 2003 our department hosted a small conference with speakers from the police, lawyers, Save the Children, Telenor, University of Umea and our third year Bachelor students. The title of the conference was “Internet — a hiding ground for paedophiles?” With this conference as a backdrop we hosted an online discussion between our students and Andrew Vachss.

The online discussion was meant to be an experimental example on how to teach ethical topics to computer students. And so far the students have responded with enthusiasm, both regarding the course as such and towards the theme of child porn on the Internet/child abuse. They were especially pleased with the online session with Andrew Vachss, giving them an opportunity to discuss using English. So far as I can tell at this stage all students thought both the experiment and the new course of Social Informatics worthwhile.

Per A. Godejord
Assistant Professor Social Informatics
Nesna University College

You May Also Like

San Diego Reader

“I met a person—I don’t know if you want to say he’s crazy or just psychopathic—but he told me this whole story about these crime–scene tapes that you get in the 7–Eleven. From the security cameras. [He talked about] how if you could only ‘direct that scene.'”
Read More

FatFreeRadio.net

“Our reasons for critiquing the [child protection] system [are] pointless. To analyze the system and point out what’s wrong with it, without the power to alter it, is masturbatory. The whole concept behind analysis is the concept behind consciousness–raising. Which is, if I show you that something is terrible, you will do something about it. That’s not reality. Reality is, it’s about power. It’s not about education, and knowledge is not power.”
Read More

The Fiction of Andrew Vachss

“I made a commitment when I started writing the series that it wasn’t going to be this stupid, plastic private eye crap where somebody stays 35 or 40 years. … This is a family of choice, which means that their highest commitment is to protect their children, and the only way to do that is to make their children go on to another life. They cannot bring those children into the family business. That’s where that decision has to be made, and that’s where the series ends.”
Read More